You run thisWritten for Claude or ChatGPT
Write a one-pager a busy person will actually read
Founder, Automation Squad
Most internal proposals bury the ask under three paragraphs of context, on the theory that the reader needs to understand before they can decide — but a busy reader stops before reaching it. Leading with the ask and pre-answering the objection reverses that, and the final self-critique catches the one line that will get picked apart.
The prompt
I need a one-pager on [THE SUBJECT] for [WHO — their role, and how much they already know]. What I want them to do after reading: [THE SPECIFIC ACTION — approve, fund, decide, stop worrying] What they'll be sceptical about: [YOUR HONEST GUESS] What I have: [PASTE YOUR NOTES, DATA, DRAFT — however messy] Write it as: 1. THE ASK, in the first two sentences. What I want and what it costs. Not background. If they read only this, they should be able to say yes or no. 2. WHY NOW. Three bullets. Why this can't wait a quarter — and if it genuinely could, say so instead of manufacturing urgency. 3. WHAT IT COSTS. Money, time, people, opportunity. Include the ongoing cost, not just the one-off, because that's the number people feel misled about later. 4. THE OBJECTION, answered. Take their most likely objection, state it fairly in their words, and answer it. One paragraph. Pre-empting it beats being caught by it. 5. WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T. Concrete and honest. If the answer is "not much", that's important information and I need to know before I send this rather than after. 6. THE DECISION I NEED, and by when. Rules: one page. No background section — if they need context, it goes inside the ask. No adjectives doing the work of numbers. If a sentence would survive being deleted, delete it. Then tell me the weakest sentence in what you wrote and why.
Copy it, paste it, run it. Nothing here is gated.
More for the same job
Written for Claude or ChatGPT as of August 2026. Models change — if this stops working the way it should, that is worth telling us about.
