You run thisWritten for ChatGPT or Claude
Read a long announcement and find out what changed for me specifically
Founder, Automation Squad
Vendor announcements are written to be impressive to everyone, which makes them useless to anyone in particular, and the thing that actually affects you is usually a conditional buried well below the headline. Section 3 is the highest-value part: most disappointment with new features comes from a region, tier or admin gate mentioned once in passing.
The prompt
Here's a long announcement, changelog, or article: [PASTE IT, OR GIVE THE LINK] Here's me: [YOUR JOB, THE TOOLS YOU ACTUALLY USE DAILY, AND ANY PLAN TIERS YOU'RE ON] Don't summarise it. I can read. Tell me what changed for me. 1. THE ONE-LINE ANSWER. Does this affect me at all — yes, no, or only if something else is true? If the honest answer is no, say no in the first line and stop pretending otherwise for five paragraphs. 2. WHAT'S DIFFERENT ON MONDAY. Only things that change what I do, see, pay, or can no longer do. Skip anything I'd have to go looking for. 3. THE CONDITIONS I MIGHT MISS. Region, plan tier, platform, admin permission, effective date, gradual rollout. This is where "available now" turns out to mean "available to someone else". 4. WHAT BREAKS. Anything deprecated, retired, moved, or renamed that I might be relying on. Give me the date. 5. THE ONE THING TO DO ABOUT IT, if there is one. If there's nothing to do, say "nothing to do" — that's a legitimate and useful answer. Rules: no enthusiasm. Do not tell me this is exciting or significant. If a change is buried in paragraph 30 and matters more than the headline, lead with it — that happens more often than not.
Copy it, paste it, run it. Nothing here is gated.
More for the same job
Written for ChatGPT or Claude as of August 2026. Models change — if this stops working the way it should, that is worth telling us about.
